W70
Department of Plant Breeding, 252 Emerson Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
The emergence of a National Corn Genome Initiative (NCGI) proposing to
unify public and private research programs was a catalyst for initiating
scientific and political discussion of plant genome research as evidenced
by the National Academy of Sciences' meeting "Protecting Our Food Supply:
The Value of Plant Genome Initiatives". This meeting was unique because it
was focused on the need for plant genomic research in the US as well as
discussion of a scientifically sound strategy for accumulating information
about genes, especially for grain crops. Comparative genomics research
will strengthen the NCGI proposal by allowing the cross-referencing of the
genetics of biochemical, physiological, and agronomic traits. The unique
opportunities for complementary genomic research in other cereal crops
should be accommodated in any US national effort. Corn may be the best
model cereal for two disparate reasons: corn has incomparable genetics and
gene tagging advantages, and the corn industry is the most powerful crop
lobby. However, maize can benefit from comparative genetics research in
related species. It is also clear that each crop has unique
characteristics and agricultural research needs, such as, microsatellite
markers and expressed sequence tags (ESTs). An integrated funding program
should (1) emphasize basic genomic sciences in corn as well as other
cereals, (2) provide for the development of genetic resources and
methodologies specific to each crop, such as microsatellites, BAC
libraries, ESTs, and sequencing and transformation technologies, and (3)
provide for the application of genomic tools to solve agricultural and
consumer-based problems.